The High Cost of ImmoralityGeorge Bush’s lust for …

April 6th, 2008

The High Cost of ImmoralityGeorge Bush’s lust for Hussein snuff films comes with a steep price tag:WASHINGTON — The war in Iraq could ultimately cost well over a trillion dollars — at least double what has already been spent — including the long-term costs of replacing damaged equipment, caring for wounded troops, and aiding the Iraqi government, according to a new government analysis.

At the time [March 2003], the White House and then-defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld predicted a quick, decisive victory and counted on Iraqi oil revenues to pay for the war. And when Lawrence Lindsey, one of Bush’s top budget advisers, estimated in 2003 that the entire undertaking could cost as much as $200 billion, he was fired.

Even that estimate — which the Bush administration described at the time as far too high — was still well off the mark. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that as of June, up to $500 billion has been spent on combat operations in Iraq.

More Notes from PDF

April 3rd, 2008

I really liked the format of the conference - the 10 and 20-minute speakers kept things jumping!  I had some trouble with internet access and power strips, so I'll just dump in some notes.

Pew Study - Internet and American Life session – 75 M in 2004 did some sort of political activity related to the campaign, online.  In this cycle, half of internet population and growing.

In the past 10 years, went from wealthy white males using the internet for politics, now there’s rough parity between the sexes. Average age in 96 was 33, now it’s risen to age 39. It’s a lot less white, the minorities using the net for politics has doubled. The number of people saying the net was the primary source of political information doubled since 2004. In the competition between the internet and other sources for news, the internet is the one line on the graph that goes up. Spread of broadband has been driving this. People under 35 using broadband are now saying, for general news, the net is almost as important for them as television. And for political news, it’s more important than newspapers.

There’s a highly forensic quality to the type of information people get online. It’s primary source material, they like the transparency, and it’s much more easy to find. They use comedy sites like the Onion and Daily show. People have a more expanded notion of what news is and where it comes from. Candidate sites, and special interest sites. However, local news and local politics aren’t really showing up as much.

14 million people being content creators in the last political cycle.

Speaker from Pew predicts, that just the act of getting wireless will impact politics. New voters don’t think of the internet as a separate realm of "virtual life" as opposed to real life. The notion that the net is in competition will fade – in younger people’s heads, the world is mushing up together in such a way that the old categories don’t make sense. When they’re not with the device they love, they love the device they’re with.

___________________________

{PDF got great Sponsors, like Eventful, icontact, FeedBrner, BlogAds, the New York Observer, YouTube…}

____________________

Yochai Benkler, Yale Law School, Author, the Wealth of Networks.

Let’s examine. Democracies began to rely on mass media began in 1840. Rose from $10K to $2.5 million – a bifurcation between production and consumption. Characterizes the next 150 years.

SETI at home was the fastest supercomputer in the world – by pushing processing to the edge. Every connected person has the physical capital that they need to communicate.

So now, the most important inputs into the most advanced economies, are humans, with non-fungible time, experience, wisdom. Commons based production, increases the diversity of actors and their transactions. Decentralizes authority to act, places it where capacity to act is. So stuff can really get done.

Grid: decentralized at top, centralized at bottom. Left is market based, right is non-market.

TL:Price-system, TR social sharing, BL firms

Democratic public sphere needs universal intake, filtering, dyenthesis and salience, and independence from gonverment. The limitations of mass media is that they rely on one tiny intake funnel, owners have too much control, and the baywatch effect, let’s disperse attention from the difficult and pay attention to fluff.

Different players want different outcomes – government wants less scrutiny, companies want more control, citizens want more transparency, etc.

[Refers to the sunlight foundation, Greg Elin’s hard work…]

[Great chart of Sinclair’s stock price and at what point they said they’re not going to air the swift boat show. Terrific case study!]

Dish satellite tv system - Travel Document Systems (TDS)Ann Arbor. One of the

April 1st, 2008

Travel Document Systems (TDS)Ann Arbor. One of the 10 best hospitals in America in national list.Source: www.traveldocs.comThe Festival Speech Synthesis SystemIntended for elementary and dish satellite tv system secondary school students and dish satellite tv system teachers who are interested in learning about the nervous system and dish satellite tv system brain with hands on …Source: www.cstr.ed.ac.ukThe Mozart Programming SystemLearn about asteroids, comets, planets, and dish satellite tv system the sun. Also contains facts, news, and dish satellite tv system pictures.Source: www.mozart-oz.org

Iran's Fancy New Centrifuges

March 30th, 2008

Suck, according to Jeffrey Lewis at Arms Control Wonk.

If you happened to hear my interview with the Pundit Review on WRKO Boston, I mentioned that Iran’s shoddy centrifuges was the biggest obstacle in their quest for weapons grade fissible material. So when I read that Iran had purchased 3,000 new pieces for their centrifuge collection, I was a bit perturbed.

Luckily, Jeff was there to bring me back down to Earth: So, in case you missed it … some members of the news media are freaking out, reporting Ahmadinejad’s claim that Iran is enriching uranium “on an industrial scale,

iPhoto is a piece of shit

March 27th, 2008

This blog is mostly about the scripts that I write, I’m trying to give back… but I reserve the right to talk about other techy things every now and again and today is one of those days…

I’ve spent the best part of a day splitting my iPhoto library into 6 separate libraries. Why? Because if I don’t, iPhoto is slower than mole-asses. How hard is it to display an image and let me give it a star rating and move onto the next image without locking up my machine for 10 seconds. How hard is it to select a bunch of images and give them a keyword. This isn’t rocket science. Well since I’ve split up my libraries it doesn’t look like it’s going to be easy to update my iPod Photo with photos from all libraries
which is a shame. However this does seem to have solved my iPhoto performance
problems.

I had 15K photos from about 5 years, mostly all 1-2 Megapixels That was about 9Gigs of photos with another 6 Gigs used by the iPod Photo Cache.

Here’s how to do it… Copy your iPhoto Library directory to a new directory e.g. “2005 Library” (if you’re feeling fancy you can skip copying the iPod Photo Cache directory.
Open up iPhoto and hold down alt/option while it starts, you can now select your 2005 Library and open it. Use the calendar to select all images that are not in 2005 and erase them (I hold down option, cmd and delete) and then empty the trash (command, shift, delete), remove all unused/empty albums. kill iPhoto. Restart iPhoto, but this time hold down option AND command, select to rebuild everything. Let it run for 10 minutes.

Now if you’re feeling fancy you can go into your 2005 Library in a Terminal and do a
find 19* 200[^5] | fgrep .
this will show you all the files that have periods and are in years you supposedly just erased. Hopefully there will only be a bunch of DS_Store directories. As long as there are no images in those directories replace fgrep with rm -rf in that above command line to clear them up.

Do this for each year, or whatever natural split would make sense for you. You can get fancy by copying the whole library only twice and then splitting the difference repeatedly to avoid the amount of file copying.

If only Picasa was available for OSX. I hear aperture is even more of a machine grinder…. and what’s up with not letting me fix a wonky horizon in iPhoto?

And while I’m bitching, I’m still super pissed that Apple stole my smart playlist updating on my iPod, you see I mostly use my iPod to rate my music, I have a playlist with genre == whatever and my rating == nostars. Then I can listen to it, rate my songs and I know all songs on that playlist need rating, It’s nice to see the number of songs on the playlist go down as I revisit it and rate more songs. Well they stole it from me, an iPod update took that functionality away and I had to reimage the entire iPod (60 gigs!) with an older firmware which I still had lying around (a miracle!) and now I miss the nicer menu navigation in the newer firmware. Bastards.

Apple Tech Note, SmartPlaylists.com rants. Believe me I’ve sent plenty of feedback to Apple on this one…

These two experiences are really making me wonder about my OSX fandom, I love love love the window manager in OSX (wish it had focus follows mouse, but love the transient window behavior). I love that almost everything can be keyboard shortcuts (even selecting different Firefox windows (command-tilde), and I really like the arrow keys on my powerbook and how you can page up/down with a modifier key (I really miss that when I use a windows laptop now). I love running X windows from my Linux box at work right here at home on my Mac and it’s almost seamless. I love how built in everything is (address book/calendar) and I even got used to the command-C/V/X pasting. But when these applications break, or suck, I’m stuck with them and I need to get used to it, this lock-in really worries me. Not that windows would solve my iPod problems…

The Sopranos Ending

March 19th, 2008

With Emmy nominations out, there’s apparently some buzz that the inconclusive ending to the series might hurt its chances.

Personally…I thought the ending was brilliant.
First of all, anyone who thought that David Chase was going to provide *any* sort of conclusive or definitive ending to “Sopranos” just wasn’t paying attention. Chase not only delights in flying in the face of fan expectations, but apparently still treasures the fact that fans are STILL annoyed about the Russian mobster who escaped into the snow-covered forest, never to be seen again. I didn’t think for a moment that Chase would tie everything off because LIFE doesn’t tie everything off.

In the movie “Man on the Moon,” Andy Kaufman (Jim Carrey) asks a wise man what the secret of comedy is. The wise man replies, “Silence.”

Later Kaufman is shown delightedly coming up with the notion of booby-trapping his special so that, at about the mid-point, the picture would start rolling. His concept was that all across America, people watching the special would go to their TVs and start trying to fix the horizontal hold, and even banging on their sets in frustration. He thought that it would be funny.

Chase applied that sort of thinking to his finale.

I’m sitting there watching the conclusion in a hotel room (I was in LA at the time.) The tension is building, shot by shot. Everything seems innocuous, and so you just KNOW that SOMETHING is going to happen. Tony’s daughter is struggling to park the car; will her inability to parallel park mean that she winds up surviving a massacre? A spooky looking guy keeps glancing Tony’s way. He heads into the bathroom. Is he going in there for a gun? Tony seems oblivious, or is he? Tension build, tension build, almost to the breaking point…

Screen goes black.

I jump to my feet, and I’m shouting, “Son of a bitch!” I’m convinced the cable’s gone out. I’m positive that everyone else is watching this and seeing the ending and my stupid cable has chosen that moment to go on the fritz. For ten of the longest seconds of my life I’m going out of my mind…and then the credits start to roll. It takes me a moment to register what I’ve just seen: I didn’t miss anything. That WAS the end.

Nothing that David Chase could have put in there–NOTHING–could have equaled, in terms of pure emotion, the mind-rending agitation I felt in those long seconds of silence. SIlence, which is apparently the secret to drama as well as comedy. Yelling at the TV, cursing my fate to miss the final moments due to technological ineptitude. Feeling that same frustration that viewers of the Kaufman special would have felt, but heightened. Just as “The Sopranos” was a deeply personal story for Chase, so was the ending a personal experience for every viewer, because everyone experienced their own level of frustration and angst by not knowing for long seconds what the hell was happening.

And, of course, it’s destined to be unique. Short of riffing it in parody, no one can ever do something like that again. It’s “the Sopraonos ending.”

As I said…brilliant.

PAD

Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

March 17th, 2008

On this day 20 years ago, Ronald Reagan stood before a divided Berlin at the Brandenburg Gate. He delivered a speech that was broadcast around the world – as several American Presidents had before him. The year was 1987. It was the height of the Cold War. The conventional wisdom of the time stated the Iron Curtain would remain in place and the best anyone could ever hope for was a prolonging of the status quo.

Ronald Reagan didn’t believe that. He believed in confronting the enemies of freedom – and so he went to the Brandenburg Gate armed with four words. His staff didn’t want him to say those four words. It simply wasn’t done. One could not stand before the Soviets and demand the Berlin Wall be torn down. Reagan didn’t care. He said what he went there to say, consequences be damned.

I have read and listened to Reagan’s Brandenburg Gate Address many times. I thought to be able to summarize it for you, but I can’t find where to edit it. I guess that’s what happens when you come across one of the truly great works in the history of speechmaking.

So, dear reader, I quote for you here today the Gipper – at his rhetorical best. You may read, or listen as you like.
Thank you. Thank you, very much.

Chancellor Kohl, Governing Mayor Diepgen, ladies and gentlemen: Twenty four years ago, President John F. Kennedy visited Berlin, and speaking to the people of this city and the world at the city hall. Well since then two other presidents have come, each in his turn to Berlin. And today, I, myself, make my second visit to your city.

We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it’s our duty to speak in this place of freedom. But I must confess, we’re drawn here by other things as well; by the feeling of history in this city — more than 500 years older than our own nation; by the beauty of the Grunewald and the Tiergarten; most of all, by your courage and determination. Perhaps the composer, Paul Linke, understood something about American Presidents. You see, like so many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: “Ich hab noch einen Koffer in Berlin” [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.]

Our gathering today is being broadcast throughout Western Europe and North America. I understand that it is being seen and heard as well in the East. To those listening throughout Eastern Europe, I extend my warmest greetings and the good will of the American people. To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.]

Behind me stands a wall that encircles the free sectors of this city, part of a vast system of barriers that divides the entire continent of Europe. From the Baltic South, those barriers cut across Germany in a gash of barbed wire, concrete, dog runs, and guard towers. Farther south, there may be no visible, no obvious wall. But there remain armed guards and checkpoints all the same — still a restriction on the right to travel, still an instrument to impose upon ordinary men and women the will of a totalitarian state.

Yet, it is here in Berlin where the wall emerges most clearly; here, cutting across your city, where the news photo and the television screen have imprinted this brutal division of a continent upon the mind of the world.

Standing before the Brandenburg Gate, every man is a German separated from his fellow men.

Every man is a Berliner, forced to look upon a scar.

President Von Weizsäcker has said, “The German question is open as long as the Brandenburg Gate is closed.” Well today — today I say: As long as this gate is closed, as long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand, it is not the German question alone that remains open, but the question of freedom for all mankind.
Yet, I do not come here to lament. For I find in Berlin a message of hope, even in the shadow of this wall, a message of triumph.

In this season of spring in 1945, the people of Berlin emerged from their air-raid shelters to find devastation. Thousands of miles away, the people of the United States reached out to help. And in 1947 Secretary of State — as you’ve been told — George Marshall announced the creation of what would become known as the Marshall Plan. Speaking precisely 40 years ago this month, he said: “Our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine, but against hunger, poverty, desperation, and chaos.”

In the Reichstag a few moments ago, I saw a display commemorating this 40th anniversary of the Marshall Plan. I was struck by a sign — the sign on a burnt-out, gutted structure that was being rebuilt. I understand that Berliners of my own generation can remember seeing signs like it dotted throughout the western sectors of the city. The sign read simply: “The Marshall Plan is helping here to strengthen the free world.” A strong, free world in the West — that dream became real. Japan rose from ruin to become an economic giant. Italy, France, Belgium — virtually every nation in Western Europe saw political and economic rebirth; the European Community was founded.

In West Germany and here in Berlin, there took place an economic miracle, the Wirtschaftswunder. Adenauer, Erhard, Reuter, and other leaders understood the practical importance of liberty — that just as truth can flourish only when the journalist is given freedom of speech, so prosperity can come about only when the farmer and businessman enjoy economic freedom. The German leaders — the German leaders reduced tariffs, expanded free trade, lowered taxes. From 1950 to 1960 alone, the standard of living in West Germany and Berlin doubled.

Where four decades ago there was rubble, today in West Berlin there is the greatest industrial output of any city in Germany: busy office blocks, fine homes and apartments, proud avenues, and the spreading lawns of parkland. Where a city’s culture seemed to have been destroyed, today there are two great universities, orchestras and an opera, countless theaters, and museums. Where there was want, today there’s abundance — food, clothing, automobiles — the wonderful goods of the Kudamm.¹ From devastation, from utter ruin, you Berliners have, in freedom, rebuilt a city that once again ranks as one of the greatest on earth. Now the Soviets may have had other plans. But my friends, there were a few things the Soviets didn’t count on: Berliner Herz, Berliner Humor, ja, und Berliner Schnauze. [Berliner heart, Berliner humor, yes, and a Berliner Schnauze.²]

In the 1950s — In the 1950s Khrushchev predicted: “We will bury you.”
But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind — too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor.
And now — now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. Some political prisoners have been released. Certain foreign news broadcasts are no longer being jammed. Some economic enterprises have been permitted to operate with greater freedom from state control.

Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state? Or are they token gestures intended to raise false hopes in the West, or to strengthen the Soviet system without changing it? We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty — the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace.
There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace.

General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate.

Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate.

Mr. Gorbachev — Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!

I understand the fear of war and the pain of division that afflict this continent, and I pledge to you my country’s efforts to help overcome these burdens. To be sure, we in the West must resist Soviet expansion. So, we must maintain defenses of unassailable strength. Yet we seek peace; so we must strive to reduce arms on both sides.

Beginning 10 years ago, the Soviets challenged the Western alliance with a grave new threat, hundreds of new and more deadly SS-20 nuclear missiles capable of striking every capital in Europe. The Western alliance responded by committing itself to a counter-deployment (unless the Soviets agreed to negotiate a better solution) — namely, the elimination of such weapons on both sides. For many months, the Soviets refused to bargain in earnestness. As the alliance, in turn, prepared to go forward with its counter-deployment, there were difficult days, days of protests like those during my 1982 visit to this city; and the Soviets later walked away from the table.
But through it all, the alliance held firm. And I invite those who protested then — I invite those who protest today — to mark this fact: Because we remained strong, the Soviets came back to the table. Because we remained strong, today we have within reach the possibility, not merely of limiting the growth of arms, but of eliminating, for the first time, an entire class of nuclear weapons from the face of the earth.

As I speak, NATO ministers are meeting in Iceland to review the progress of our proposals for eliminating these weapons. At the talks in Geneva, we have also proposed deep cuts in strategic offensive weapons. And the Western allies have likewise made far-reaching proposals to reduce the danger of conventional war and to place a total ban on chemical weapons.

While we pursue these arms reductions, I pledge to you that we will maintain the capacity to deter Soviet aggression at any level at which it might occur. And in cooperation with many of our allies, the United States is pursuing the Strategic Defense Initiative — research to base deterrence not on the threat of offensive retaliation, but on defenses that truly defend; on systems, in short, that will not target populations, but shield them. By these means we seek to increase the safety of Europe and all the world. But we must remember a crucial fact: East and West do not mistrust each other because we are armed; we are armed because we mistrust each other. And our differences are not about weapons but about liberty. When President Kennedy spoke at the City Hall those 24 years ago, freedom was encircled; Berlin was under siege. And today, despite all the pressures upon this city, Berlin stands secure in its liberty. And freedom itself is transforming the globe.

In the Philippines, in South and Central America, democracy has been given a rebirth. Throughout the Pacific, free markets are working miracle after miracle of economic growth. In the industrialized nations, a technological revolution is taking place, a revolution marked by rapid, dramatic advances in computers and telecommunications.

In Europe, only one nation and those it controls refuse to join the community of freedom. Yet in this age of redoubled economic growth, of information and innovation, the Soviet Union faces a choice: It must make fundamental changes, or it will become obsolete.

Today, thus, represents a moment of hope. We in the West stand ready to cooperate with the East to promote true openness, to break down barriers that separate people, to create a safer, freer world. And surely there is no better place than Berlin, the meeting place of East and West, to make a start.

Free people of Berlin: Today, as in the past, the United States stands for the strict observance and full implementation of all parts of the Four Power Agreement of 1971. Let us use this occasion, the 750th anniversary of this city, to usher in a new era, to seek a still fuller, richer life for the Berlin of the future. Together, let us maintain and develop the ties between the Federal Republic and the Western sectors of Berlin, which is permitted by the 1971 agreement.

And I invite Mr. Gorbachev: Let us work to bring the Eastern and Western parts of the city closer together, so that all the inhabitants of all Berlin can enjoy the benefits that come with life in one of the great cities of the world.
To open Berlin still further to all Europe, East and West, let us expand the vital air access to this city, finding ways of making commercial air service to Berlin more convenient, more comfortable, and more economical. We look to the day when West Berlin can become one of the chief aviation hubs in all central Europe.
With — With our French — With our French and British partners, the United States is prepared to help bring international meetings to Berlin. It would be only fitting for Berlin to serve as the site of United Nations meetings, or world conferences on human rights and arms control, or other issues that call for international cooperation.

There is no better way to establish hope for the future than to enlighten young minds, and we would be honored to sponsor summer youth exchanges, cultural events, and other programs for young Berliners from the East. Our French and British friends, I’m certain, will do the same. And it’s my hope that an authority can be found in East Berlin to sponsor visits from young people of the Western sectors.
One final proposal, one close to my heart: Sport represents a source of enjoyment and ennoblement, and you may have noted that the Republic of Korea — South Korea — has offered to permit certain events of the 1988 Olympics to take place in the North. International sports competitions of all kinds could take place in both parts of this city. And what better way to demonstrate to the world the openness of this city than to offer in some future year to hold the Olympic games here in Berlin, East and West.

In these four decades, as I have said, you Berliners have built a great city. You’ve done so in spite of threats — the Soviet attempts to impose the East-mark, the blockade. Today the city thrives in spite of the challenges implicit in the very presence of this wall. What keeps you here? Certainly there’s a great deal to be said for your fortitude, for your defiant courage. But I believe there’s something deeper, something that involves Berlin’s whole look and feel and way of life — not mere sentiment. No one could live long in Berlin without being completely disabused of illusions. Something, instead, that has seen the difficulties of life in Berlin but chose to accept them, that continues to build this good and proud city in contrast to a surrounding totalitarian presence, that refuses to release human energies or aspirations, something that speaks with a powerful voice of affirmation, that says “yes” to this city, yes to the future, yes to freedom. In a word, I would submit that what keeps you in Berlin — is “love.”

Love both profound and abiding.

Perhaps this gets to the root of the matter, to the most fundamental distinction of all between East and West. The totalitarian world produces backwardness because it does such violence to the spirit, thwarting the human impulse to create, to enjoy, to worship. The totalitarian world finds even symbols of love and of worship an affront.

Years ago, before the East Germans began rebuilding their churches, they erected a secular structure: the television tower at Alexander Platz. Virtually ever since, the authorities have been working to correct what they view as the tower’s one major flaw: treating the glass sphere at the top with paints and chemicals of every kind. Yet even today when the sun strikes that sphere, that sphere that towers over all Berlin, the light makes the sign of the cross. There in Berlin, like the city itself, symbols of love, symbols of worship, cannot be suppressed.
As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner (quote):

“This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality.”

Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall, for it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.

And I would like, before I close, to say one word. I have read, and I have been questioned since I’ve been here about certain demonstrations against my coming. And I would like to say just one thing, and to those who demonstrate so. I wonder if they have ever asked themselves that if they should have the kind of government they apparently seek, no one would ever be able to do what they’re doing again.

Thank you and God bless you all. Thank you.Where is the Wall which Reagan so forcibly helped crumble? Well, I found a few pieces of it in a very unlikely place, unless you understand and appreciate the efforts made by America’s Cold Warriors. At the US Army Intelligence Museum in Ft. Huachuca, Arizona - an obscure place if ever there was one, are found two slabs of the Wall. Here’s one:

So much for conventional wisdom.

Here endeth the lesson.

jizzob hunting

March 16th, 2008

Nothing to see here. Nobody reads this anyway, but I’m looking for a permanent job in oh, let’s say Bangladesh.
My hometown, anyway.
I want a dog.
Or a cat.
Yeah, a cat would be cooler.
I also want to have a normal life where I can commit to crap during the week like comedy, or a writing group.

what would life be without wishful thinking . . .

Stuck: The summer doldrums

March 15th, 2008

The last few weeks have been a bit stressful for me and my reading and blog-writing has suffered. Meaning, I’ve read almost nothing and written zilch in a month. I’m stuck in a couple of books and I need a push to move ahead. I find it difficult to just stop reading a book completely; I belive in cleaning my plate and finishing off a bottle of moisturizer before opening another. I’m suffering through a banana-scented gift lotion because of this trait, but no worries — I only use it at home and it’s a little jar. Then I can move on the vanilla milk lotion from Bath & Body Works. I’m getting off point…
I am reading Suite Francaise by Irene Nemirovsky which has received lots of critical praise and I’m stumped as to why I cannot get into this book. Here’s what Publishers Weekly has to say about it:

“Celebrated in pre-WWII France for her bestselling fiction, the Jewish Russian-born Némirovsky was shipped to Auschwitz in the summer of 1942, months after this long-lost masterwork was composed. Némirovsky, a convert to Catholicism, began a planned five-novel cycle as Nazi forces overran northern France in 1940. This gripping ’suite,’ collecting the first two unpolished but wondrously literary sections of a work cut short, have surfaced more than six decades after her death. The first, ‘Storm in June,’ chronicles the connecting lives of a disparate clutch of Parisians, among them a snobbish author, a venal banker, a noble priest shepherding churlish orphans, a foppish aesthete and a loving lower-class couple, all fleeing city comforts for the chaotic countryside, mere hours ahead of the advancing Germans. The second, ‘Dolce,’ set in 1941 in a farming village under German occupation, tells how peasant farmers, their pretty daughters and petit bourgeois collaborationists coexisted with their Nazi rulers. In a workbook entry penned just weeks before her arrest, Némirovsky noted that her goal was to describe ‘daily life, the emotional life and especially the comedy it provides.’ This heroic work does just that, by focusing—with compassion and clarity—on individual human dramas.”

Well, now that I read that reivew, I am understanding my situation more. War, tragedy and sad stories — perfect for summer! But, I am resolved to finish it and to continue through the stack of books I bought at the News Sentinel book sale. Reading and drinking iced tea under a fan sounds nice. A few of the books I plan to read this summer include some chick lit titles (Baby Proof by Emily Giffin, Queen of Babble by Meg Cabot, and the latest from Jane Green), the new Harry Potter (which I will likely read in one sitting after turning the phone off) and Barbara Kingsolver’s latest nonfiction Animal, Vegetable, Miracle about her family’s attempt to eat locally grown food for a year. I love Kingsolver’s works so anything she writes, I’ll read.

Speaking of Harry Potter, I watched The Goblet of Fire last night to prepare for The Order of the Phoenix which opens in theaters Wednesday. I’d love to read Half-Blood Prince again before Deathly Hallows arrives. The talk around the office is about whether Harry will go off to the big Quidditch game in the sky in the last book. I think he’s going to die. He and Voldemort are linked: he’ll have to sacrifice himself to rid the world of the evil wizard. Do you think he’ll die?

What are you reading this summer? I’d love some new suggestions.

Downloading the New York Times Crossword with Automator

March 14th, 2008

Wordplay got me into doing crosswords. If Jon Stewart, Bill Clinton, and the Indigo Girls are all into something (not to mention Ken Burns) I’d be crazy not to be all up on that. I bought the yearly online subscription to the New York Times puzzle and have been doing (attempting) it pretty much every day.

I made a workflow with Apple’s Automator to download each day’s puzzle from the Times’ website and print it out. If you’re in a similar position as I (you have the subscription, Across Lite, and Mac OS X 10.4) then give it a try: Print Crossword.workflow.

The overall workflow is pretty straightforward:
Start with the New York Times crossword page URL
Download the page, with proper authentication
Find the URL to today’s puzzleDownload today’s puzzleOpen today’s puzzlePrint today’s puzzleThere were two tricky bits at #3 and #6, which I had to solve using shell scripting and AppleScript, respectively.

While Safari scripting does a fair amount (I was happy it took care of using my NYTimes.com cookie for the authentication), it doesn’t handle #3, which actually surprised me. The task I needed is to get the URL linked to with the words “Today’s Puzzle.